User talk:Samforprospe

October 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Indian cities by GDP per capita, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Filpro (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deepika Padukone.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Deepika Padukone was changed by Samforprospe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880579 on 2015-10-28T12:00:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of Indian cities by GDP per capita. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kozhikode article and other articles

From what I see here and at other articles, you are removing sourced material and replacing it with unsourced material. That is a no-go. You appear to be removing things on a WP:IDON'TLIKEIT basis, and whatever WP:Neutral editing you think you are engaging in seems to be wrong. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kozhikode with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No it was not a mistake, but before it denotes a certain community and will create divide. So for neutrality reasons I did it. If you notice the change especially in "cuisines" area please change to normal. Thanks

Talk:Non Resident Nepali#The number of Nepali in India

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Non Resident Nepali#The number of Nepali in India. Because you edited this article relatively recently, I thought you might be interested in the discussion I've started on the article's talk page. Cheers! Thanks. ► Bgpaulus (WORDS & DEEDS) ◄ 19:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangalore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bangalore, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for promoting Bangalore

It's "warts and all" Jim1138 (talk) 08:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

have you checked the reference provided. If not why talk like this. i explained the reference provided doesn't match the article.

The reference does not "match" because the link is 404. Tried fixing it? Again, see wp:KDL Jim1138 (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Please keep content on this page per top of my talk page. You left an inadequate edit summary. That is not an acceptable reason for removal. The slum content stays. See wikt:whitewashing - not acceptable. Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See wp:KDL the slum content stays. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of tallest buildings in Kerala. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Your recent editing history at Bangalore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 09:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Bangalore. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 14:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]